Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Korren

Testers
  • Content Count

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Korren

  • Rank
    Nestling

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Programming, Writing, Video Games
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    San Diego, CA
  1. I ... I like this idea. After reading the news on the EK today, I was a bit disappointed, to be honest. Everything else about Crowfall got me pumped, but EK has always been the point of hesitation. I was hoping that they would do more and expand on what their original vision was with respects to how it integrates to the world at large and I think that your idea more-or-less covers it. One of the things that I felt was lacking was the impact of one EK to another. In Eve, corporations / alliances would control system(s) and have their territory expand/contract/shift based on ongoing wars, resource production, etc - and I feel that that particular mentality would be extremely beneficial to the core concept of EK (a place to rest, display relics, socialize, plan, etc) and have a lasting impact outside of the core game (the campaigns). In a way, I guess it would become a meta-campaign? It would give you (more of) a reason to collect resources and win campaigns with your guild, etc, as it could influence the political landscape of the EK. Areas could grow and become connected via alliances, borders could be set up, militias could patrol, wars could be declared as one group moves against another, and so on. There is also a place for merchants and crafters, as they would have stake in ensuring that there are players out there that need their services. This could cause shifts in power as a group of merchants decide to relocate to the next kingdom over cause they have 2% less tax (or something similar). The EKs would still be limited in the fact that there are few NPCs to fight and no resources to collect, thus solidifying the need for the campaign worlds. Note: Sorry for the slight rambling, trying to get ideas out of my head while at work.
  2. Congrats on the 1m mark! I'm really hoping to see the Kickstarter campaign surpass the 1.3m mark I also wanted to say that the bonus rewards are a really nice touch. There was a thread from last week (I believe) that touched on the stretch goals and how, while they were good, practical goals, they weren't something that benefited the backer directly (as in: "here is a gift"). I think that the bonus rewards rectified that sentiment and will hopefully inspire more potential backers into putting their pledges behind Crowfall. Good choices all-around and I'm confident that the new goals will be met before the campaign's end.
  3. I really can't argue with that. It will undoubtedly become more apparent and start to 'click' as the builds start rolling out. Having multiple campaigns with different rulesets will, at the very least, give players a chance to jump into something different than what they are used to, which I think is a great notion.
  4. LOD will help, as it can apply to models, Physx, and FX, but I am still curious to know what should be attainable, even at a pre-alpha stage. So yes, I can agree with you that it is somewhat concerning if they only have a few programmers. Hopefully there are a few more lurking in the background somewhere coding furiously.
  5. I'll admit, the idea of previously exported goods not having an impact on future campaigns is my concern. I understand part of the design / appeal is that players are dropped into the world on (relatively) even ground, but I still feel that there should be some carryover. Whether it is items that you can equip after a certain point (ie: bring your Sword of Mediocrity with you, but you can't use it for 24 hrs (or something)) at least it will give us in-campaign value of participating in campaigns. But, that is just my opinion.
  6. I would not argue about adding additional programmers. And yes, the Unity engine is good about hashing out the base idea quickly, but takes a fair amount of time to refine and optimize (like any engine). The topic of programmers has brought a question to mind though which is: how many players on screen is Crowfall aiming for? Since PvP is such a core focus of the game, I'd honestly be worried about incurring crippling lag between the destructible terrain, effects, and raw number of models running around.
  7. I could see an "intro" movie that involves voice over and perhaps dynamic art (something akin to some of Diablo III's 'filler' cinematics). Something that explains some core components of the game (The Hunger, The Gods, etc). Beyond that, I wouldn't expect more than the sound effects a character makes as they are striking, defending, or dying.
  8. I believe there are a few factors to this: They are using a game engine that has a large community (Unity) and is backed by a large catalog of 3rd party toolsets, such as animation, effects, etc which make the entire process much faster than developing an engine from the ground up. The programming language is pretty accessible and robust (C#) Typically, having 2-4x as many artists as programmers/engineers is necessary due to the amount of assets that need to be generated. Basically: it doesn't matter how flawless the code is, if the amount of assets is limited or their quality sucks, that is the first thing that people will see. That being said, a game with bad code won't play well no matter how good the art assets are. I'm sure the 800k target for the kickstarter will be used in part to pay the salary of employees and bring on additional talent as needed (perhaps contracted). This is in addition to the 2.3m that has been raised by other means, which I'm fairly certain they haven't burned through in its entirety yet.
  9. To the high-roller backers: thank you. I'm looking forward to see how this game develops in the coming months and over the next two years. That being said, I wonder if one or more of those purchases were done as a guild to try and establish themselves as a major power.
  10. That is a reasonable fear. I do hope that there is enough time / energy put into the character customization to make them semi-unique beyond armor appearance. I'm not too concerned that ACE will drop the ball on this, but I am interested in what they'll showcase regarding this.
  11. Yep, I think that is the feeling of a number of people. The game is still pre-alpha, so a lot of stuff might be sitting in various forms (sketches, game design docs, cocktail napkins) and it may be hard for them to tell us something definitive, but it would go a long way.
  12. I think that hits the nail on the head, so to speak - that right now EKs seem to be too nebulous. In a not-great way, they remind me of PlayStation Home apartments, which were basically just environments that you could decorate. Obviously there is a little more to it considering that the user can build/design their own space to a certain degree, but it becomes a minor time/resource sink with the sole purpose of ... what? Hanging out by the hearth? There isn't stake in it, there is no motivation beyond build a great hall and a bedroom and hoarding your treasure there. There are a lot of ideas that have been coming from the eager player base, and some of them have been good. I'll probably through my own two cents in at some point, but I trust (and want to believe) the devs are going through and collecting ideas, effectively crowd-sourcing some design elements that fit with the overall theme of the game.
  13. Really fantastic progress so far. I'm looking forward to the steady march of hitting the stretch goals over the coming weeks.
  14. It was stated that there would be more character customization, but they opted to showcase the various races and archetypes instead of only a few with different appearances, etc. I would like to see a set of examples though (let's say a Human Knight for ease) that showcases different outfits / armor / weapons / etc. to give a feel for how characters will look as they progress.
×
×
  • Create New...