Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


ACE Development Partners
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location

Corpsewake's Achievements


Newbie (1/14)



  1. I do see what you mean in the terms, and while I was not threatening, I admit to being accusing, and apologize, I should have considered how it could make him feel too. In the future, I suppose I will be a good crow and run to the powers that be... :/
  2. I strongly disagree sir. Saying parents should allow children to eat all the ice cream the kids want because they trust them to be responsible is an analogy. Bringing up that drugs should be legal (or as implied by the poster, illegal) is politics. Your straw-man rebuttal does not counter the standing argument. There are entire parties that disagree with that fundamentally on a political basis. Any counter argument I would make to his post, would be political in nature, thus, while a real world example is often helpful, this was discussing legality of a very heated issue. Your counter argument appears to dismiss my logic on a false dichotomy, and does also seem condescending in nature. Additionally, the way I see it, my comment would only be condescending if the reader were one who identifies with reporting users liberally. While there are those out there, it was not my intent to prove superiority. I prefer not to involve the powers that be, and it was merely intended to be an expression of that view. Having said that, I also don't appreciate getting heated when coming to a forum that should be (at least in regard to the real world) leisurely.
  3. It kind of sounds as though you're looking for a different kind of game.
  4. Let's keep the philosophy and politics out of our gaming, or at least in the off topic section. I think political discussion is against TOS and this is grazing if not crossing that line. (P.S. Didn't report you because I think it's mean to do so without addressing things first). Use the service to discuss anything about real-world politics or religion as these topics are inherently divisive and not part of the game experience.
  5. We did get divine cathedrals (some of us anyway) from the kickstarter. I believe they house religious relics that make you stronger in the Campaign Worlds
  6. Wow. Solid job on the collector's edition. I am quite pleased with all of the choices made.
  7. Im sorry. :/ reading it again sounds very different than what I read last night.
  8. I highly disagree. it is more of a risk to pledge $2500 than to pledge $5 or $500 and wait and see. Backing earlier is a factor, backing early with more is more risky. I would not want to rob the bloodstones of the value of their packages by getting late benefits anymore than I want that to happen to me. :/ I agree with you Zandur.
  9. I doubt ACE would alienate their high level backers with something like this. It is a bug. Also, in regards to the format, if you recall, that was the same format used previously for upgrade tiers. You do not get each, you get the highest. The others were previously listed as well in the KS backing lists, but we did not get them at the higher tiers. It included the rewards from lower tiers in the lists. I may not be phrasing this correctly, but to be concise, it is listing the sapphire and ruby reward, but you only get the ruby stuff. For example, you do not get the title of baron and count, you get the title of Count. You do not get a Medium and a Small Castle, you get a Medium Castle. The baron title, and the small castle are from the sapphire list. Another Example is that the Emerald Kickstarter rewards list showed every reward from backer to emerald including each tier. The list was lengthy, and would have included insane amounts of strongholds, vip, and parcels. We did not get those items, since they were not part of the "actual" emerald list, it just showed the lower tiers too. For this reason, and including the statement above, we can conclude that they are meant to be worth less than the KS backer rewards, but more than the 2015 backer rewards. This is a bug.
  10. I agree with Jihan in practice. A support character should only have access to active skills that provide benefits, that do not last 30 minutes, but 30 seconds (pretty high actually, maybe less) etc. They should be as active as any spellcaster with their support. Rather than tedious, this should be viewed as an entire role. I agree that 30 minutes of an active skill is a token activation. I would argue that it should be a meaningful activation to help at just the right moment, and if you blow it, you wait to get your buff back. Passive buffs do not add to an action game. They directly detract from the actions of the support role. There is equal strategy in active support and passive support and even more tactics involved with active casting. Passive buffs are a crutch, and should be avoided.
  11. Plus stealing in EK's is a carebear option. "What?" You might ask. It would become an outlet to get resources in a world without consequences. It creates a meta-game they want to specifically avoid, and defeats the purpose of the cw's.
  12. I agree with this whole-heartedly. Swear fealty to a lord of a large ek and bam you have your antechamber.
  13. Oh boy. That's one way to mooch an emerald I guess XD
  • Create New...