Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

idoll

Testers
  • Content Count

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by idoll

  1. Teleporting anywhere you want takes away the tactical perspective of the game. The enemy needs to have their advantage of time when they have planned perfect push for a frontline away from you, while holding the front where you fight.
  2. tbh I would prefer mastry specific stats rather than general stats... this system is flawed and can be seen in many games... its impossible to find balance when people always flock to the activity that gives the best results. However in this game the stats are cosmetic, so they probably dont care much in general.
  3. yeah its a garbage collection simulator for the moment
  4. You get better in things by doing them. In PVP you can gain progression with your own skills. so you might not notice the problem here. In farming you get zero progression with your actions and you are stuck with your crafting or harvesting goal... you can not do anything. Its a computer that gives you points per second - all you have to do is wait. The problem is that people will have goals with the progression the game is offering - not only to buy better gear to fight in PVP... you have to take it in consideration that it is so, and people want to be able to affect the result - FEEL the
  5. rebranding daily quests to missions is kinda cosmetic change ;)... I would rather want to see complete freedom of what activities you do... since thats how you would play the game. And you would get rewarded with XP to that specific field. Then you would not have to worry about making certain activities exactly equal... since it would drive players to stop playing PVP for instance if the reward for PVP could be gained by crafting easier
  6. I know there are changes to come, which none of us know about yet. So might as well be these things have been addressed in the next patch. However I saw it important to raise this topic, as there are people who consider that there is no issue in first place. So the understanding of the issue needs to be there...
  7. But the point is that you get the progression in something you feel is fun... not a daily quest. The system works following: -you play a game and do the things you like... you get the XP from there. There is max cap so you do not have need to play more than what is considered normal. so nothing would change - just that there would be reward doing activities you like doing - and differentiate your character in the market.
  8. It is not mindless timesink, when it is about getting progression from what you like doing in the game. So just play the game - you are not going to be left behind, since everyone could progress the same max cap. Well why play a game in first place if you feel normal gaming is timesink?
  9. I am adding it here, since I am quite sure it would disappear in the other thread I wrote it out. Problem: -with no online progression people get demotivated and do not see point in some activities (offline progression is the most important) -if you grant online progression people see it as a time sink, which will require you to play to be able to compete -people with crafting / farming profession goals get turned off with the idea that you can not ever be the "best", when everyone is progressing the same with offline progression So solving this issue: Make maximum XP cap / day to
  10. My style for going for development is to gather information of users, their goals and anticipation and then try to understand different aspects. That is what we need now as well, since in the end you will enjoy the game more if there is more people playing it. So it comes down to trying to figure out how things could be solved that it takes account different aspects and in respect of the vision of the game. People usually tend to think that there is only one or two solutions. There is so much more of it. The reason why we cant see it is usually that most of it has not been tried before - and t
  11. yeah... so fighting in forums over how the game should work is not about making the game better, but making it better for your guild... makes sense now But I guess its normal... people in MMO games fight in forums to make their class / race / guild what ever aspect better. Its frustrating though, when you are trying to think the game in bigger picture. People are food for the PVP. They also pay for your fun... since the more theres money - the more there usually is fun.
  12. I feel like you think you are so good in thinking whats best for everyone. But you have proven to be very narrow minded not being able to see other aspects than you own. You need to remember that everyone has different goals - or they weight the goals differently. You need to remember that there are people who are motivated by different things. Winning a campaign is good fun for sure, but it might not be the ultimate goal of all players. Some people have everything bet on it... some people just log in to have fun... others are motivated into progressing in their profession etc. If you fo
  13. I think you went too narrow minded right there - and you are not trying to see solutions to the problem. They could just as well generate XP caps per day. So after a one or two hour of gaming / day you would no longer progress. Or certain maximum XP cap / day. Actually now that I said that... it would make a lot of sense and a damn good system. So the idea; -you can get maximum number of XP points / day (that is just point cap) -all activities generate XP (PVP, PVE, "farming", crafting): each of which generate XP to that specific mastery pool -the points that you gather can be
  14. Well look - they have content in game and offline leveling system, which are not in sync. I have no reason to go farm low stuff to craft poorly made socks gear if after a while I could do better without even touching the low level nodes. And do I need to remind you that one of the core ideas in this game for PVP is farming resource, PVP DROPS! and crafting. If you lack of motivated farmers, you will lack of "player generated" PVP content.
  15. who said that? and basically no-one is suggesting removal of the offline leveling - just suggesting something meaningful aside of it
  16. I wonder if that would really help the case... if theres plenty of posts, I guess there is an issue that needs focus. Somehow devs should need to indicate also the volatility of the problem
  17. If you are a crafter or plan to be one - progressing something else than crafting isnt really going to make you happy when ou sacrifice your crafts for cosmetic stats which have no meaning for you. The victory conditions are set by players in the end of the campaign - not in the beginning. And even more so as the online leveling is not existent... I am calling for being able to progress my leveling through the activities I am doing. However there needs to be fine balance between these - online and offline leveling. Also I do want to have some limits to the leveling - so that you couldnt
  18. Once you get the intermediate gear, there really is not anything to do than just offline level. There is nothing to do in game to make you progress for your goal - what ever it may be. I used to go out and gather stuff - which I then tried to turn into better rune tools, in a crafting progression which too often fails. I didnt succeed. Bummer. The tools break again and in the end I was not able to get any better resources. The loop starts again. YES I KNOW THE PROGRESSION COMES FROM OFFLINE TRAINING - AND THATS' THE ISSUE HERE I can not do anything in game that would have any significa
  19. As the class uogrades are not published yet I suppose some new skills could come. But yeah... instead of leveling them offline it would make sence to level with kill xp or so. Fight clubs are not problem if killing same player would grant you xp only once or twice a day.
  20. So after claiming you know so much about the game and all the claims above, you are saying that... 1. Basic items you craft being in middle of woods have meaning in economy ( they do not) 2. You would never need another item after making basic crap infinite... I suppose with your logic no-one would ever need better armor if the basic whites from vendor 30 meters from spawn would be infinite. Your logics fail at every level. There is never an excuse to annoy user nor there is an excuse to claim someone elses experienece is wrong. I am sorry if you fail to understand basic stuff,
  21. Firstly you make it sound as if this was somehow hard to change ^^. It is not. You just change durability of the basic stuff to infinite. Yeah the picking right tool from bag automation would need few lines of code, but is definately not hard to do at all. It is not that I wouldnt be able to craft right tool over and over again, slot the tool over and over again and then choose right tool for the job over and over again. It just is annoying. Thats not why I spend my freetime in games. I just see its meaningless in game design way, and the game should automate the things which are meaningl
  22. I am afraid there is nothing to be said to make you understand whats bad design or good design in UX perspective. You have no clue, and have hard time to understand it. Talking about the sinple tools is not about makking same case about the high level tools. It does not mean we should take the main mechanics of the game away. You can just change the basic tools to have infinite durability. It wont break anything. It only takes away meaningless crafting, which doesnt even contribute to material sinks, economy and the basic tools do not even have ppssibilities for experimentation. Im sure y
  23. You are mixing bad design to "making game hard". I like hard, but I hate bad design. These things have nothing in common. I do not call for themepark ffs. Dont put words in other peoples mouths. I am requesting fantastic user experience, which doesnt take fun away from the meaningful things. And there will be single players joining without a guild. They will decide the fate of the game, since they either invite their friends or they do not. Like me... I will either get our guild of hundreads of players in game or I will contribute in the fact that we should skip the game. It can go
  24. "This aspect of the game was designed by, and for players who enjoy gathering resources." Who said people who enjoy gathering will enjoy constantly do same tool to gather? There is no indication of that whatsoever. "The game is annoying if you try to play solo, you have to work within a network of players and there is no way around this fundamental truth of design." Then it is a bad design if a newcomer has not in begin time to enjoy the game alone. If he doesnt already have friends in game - he will probably not then stay long enough to get friends.
  25. Look - i dont care if better tools will make it better. I care about mine and other player personal experience, when it comes down to testing the game. It is basic rules of user experience design: do not annoy the user. There really is no excuses to do so. And like i stated in my post - there is no point in gameplaywise whatsoever to make basic tools to simply break up. There is no need for such material sink and it is not needed in the economy. Do not annoy the user - this is damn rule from 1990s... why do we have to have this discussion in 2018? There is zero reasons to do so. A
×
×
  • Create New...