Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

managainsttime

Testers
  • Content Count

    257
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About managainsttime

  • Rank
    Treepie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

1,152 profile views
  1. I'll just add two things, even though I'm not necessarily disputing anything said about the race/class combination selection in games I've never played (like ArcheAge). (1) Actual character viability cannot be confirmed or verified by mass conformist trends. Average players who haven't studied a game thoroughly will often default to safe "FOTM" builds held in high esteem by popular approval. While this phenomenon will undeniably boost the number of particular builds (and decrease diversity all around), this tendency alone does not make any of those builds more "viable." If you've played any PvP game for a long enough time, surely you've seen enough of those builds crash and burn after a relatively brief period of time (occasionally through patch changes, but typically through the evolution of average PvP/GvG tendencies). "Viability" in general is never in a stable state, but always in flux -- as it should be in a solid MMO with a player-base seeking new advantages and undergoing their own form of adaptive evolution. (2) The diversity showcased by SB's race/class combo ruleset is a model worthy of emulation, whether one has enjoyed the game or not. The model had so much depth that it offered veteran players opportunities to experiment with new, unorthodox, and perfectly viable ideas even after playing the game for years. Moreover, anyone who has played the game long enough has seen plenty of builds and group dynamics declared "impossible," "ridiculous," or "not viable" by the majority of the playerbase (even on class discussion boards on the like) effectively 'break out' later and then themselves become "FOTM" due to the efforts and advocacy of a few dedicated contrarians. Such provides its own "rush" and reward to skilled players that cannot be duplicated elsewhere, and it undeniably keeps even those players who've played in hundreds of sieges and "done it all" coming back for more. Moreover, I've seen this happen in SB on some server or another in just about every period of the game, so this had very little to do with class re-balancing by patch changes alone (although of course certain FOTM builds spawned after certain passive racial abilities and the like were patched into the game later). Just a few examples I could think of from the top of my head would include PA templars back in the day, various human builds (starting with Bofis' GS warrior probably, but even including various other human warrior, caster, and at least one barb build), various aelf warrior builds, elf BW warrior builds back when you could use GS passive d null power with 'em, different PvP druids (a class that, until then, was strictly for farming except for a few dedicated contrarians), BM warriors and warlocks, different bird specs, HG sentinels, certain rangers, I could go on and on really. If Crowfall could duplicate this aspect, it'd at least ensure them a dedicated following for a substantial period of time even if the game itself becomes 'obscure' or 'forgotten' in the fickle mass market, which is worth something I guess.
  2. Just wanted to say hello. It's nice to see some former TSB players gaming around. 

  3. I know I vaguely recall your bard from either Treach or Veng, can't remember if we played in the same guild at some point or not. I played on Catskills and AC DT too (AC DT before SB - old AC DT guild "The Select Few" joined into my guild [TSB] on Treachery). I played with KoT, 409 (UO RPK guild) and JDD on Treach, before JDD left to go play on Death and had to form my own guild (TSB). We remained fairly small until the end of the server, allied with RoS/HH when CoS left, and then when RoS/HH left we were on our own against KGB/ML/TSL's massive carebear alliance, at least until JDD came back and we formed up with them and Freedom's Stain to create Chaotic Front, fought a server war for about a month before the announcements that the server was going to be axed seemed to kill everyone's interest. Anyway, good to see another old Treach player around.
  4. Well when Pann comes to kill this thread, he can read this post, since I'm unable to PM him. In case anyone is wondering, this was intended to be a response to the Warning I received from some post that VIKINGNAIL reported a good while back (I was on another long hiatus). Amusingly enough, the fact that he's reporting posts like this is just further evidence that he's not a real SB player. I've engaged in extensive, sometimes heated arguments on here with numerous SB players--some of whom, btw, definitely don't like me, and perhaps a few of whom even hate me--and despite the occasional exchange of light insults here and there, not one of us reported one of the other's posts. There's not even necessarily an implicit SB bro code on this issue, it's just that not even the most petty or annoying SB players reach the incredible level of lameness exhibited by VIKINGNAIL, who is incidentally only a make-believe SB player. Anyway, here's The Message I Couldn't Send about He Who We Shall Not Mention:
  5. Xemise is easily one of the best and brightest players in the SB world but my human warrior "Endlosung" on the Mourning server regularly romped the sword/board Exodeous and at the very worst drew him a few times.* Although I did take advantage of the post-creation blood rune thing, dewped rank 1 human+warrior boonz, FC items + high health regen, and the occasional ghoul transformation to get a ridiculously unbelievable amount of hit points (if I wrote how much it wouldn't be believed). When I combined this, the xformation, plus rage chant from a resist:con fury bot it was like cheating, as the character was virtually unkillable. Then Varg copied the template and posted it on the goddamn ubiforums! I made a few tanks utilizing similar principles in experimental templates on the emulators as well, a few were named Freezing Moon. Haven't lost a warrior duel across the two emulators yet either, even after surviving about 40 of 'em with all of the different jock sniffers that love riding my e-peen in vent. Before I joined WM everyone playing warriors thought GS was gimp. I guess while I'm at it I should also point out that throughout the entire 10v10 tournament I didn't d---nevermind, don't want to sound too conceited. * so you can imagine how difficult it was for me at times to suppress my desire to argue when every now and then in WM Vent Kally or someone else who enjoyed the self-fellatio involved in SotD/FTP memory lane time would start yappin' on and on about how Xemise never ever ever lost a fight on his warrior...
  6. Dude, you're not an "old school SB player," let alone "one of the most old school SB players." In terms of your game knowledge and ability, you are a complete newb. You haven't owned a city, run an organized guild, or prosecuted a single successful siege, let alone serving as a siege commander in a war of extended duration involving numerous banes and the stress and attrition that comes with that position, unlike many of the actual old school SB players here (the ones you probably refer to here as "SB veterans"). Additionally, since you left the game so ridiculously early with such a minimal amount of experience limited to a small release server, you haven't even witnessed a truly competitive siege featuring complex tactics, complex group composition, and competitive hard-bitten personalities who themselves had over time learned to excel at a nonpareil level on the specialist characters from their particular area of expertise. You have not even witnessed a truly excellent bane commander, an excellent priest player, an excellent scout, an excellent pure support bard, an excellent caster player, a truly excellent confessor player (I distinctly remember 'em from '03 as well as the crappy templates from that period), an excellent assassin player, and so on and so forth. You played in banes where crudely unorganized masses of bad players with bad '03 templates, with tons of unfinished chars on each side with few if any dedicated support players, crashed into one another until either SB.exe's or superior numbers determined the winner. You don't even know how to build an effective character in any class - your 2003 idea of a "template" would be balls. You've never even witnessed a spec group in action, and you quit before /tar, target calling, and voice comm use became universalized--therefore you've never encountered a solid target caller in the heat of battle either. Obviously you've never witnessed skilled target calling and skilled target conversion following the removal of /tar either, so you have absolutely no concept of how much skill is required in SB GVG. You erroneously believe that SB PvP is "slow" and doesn't require fast reflexes because you've never witnessed nor competed in a widely contested mine fight at Obsidian involving multiple nations fighting simultaneously with others unexpectedly crashing the party out of nowhere. You've never seen a spec group of any form. You don't even know what a frickin' Nephilim is, or what Vamp Necromancers do. Another thing that you can't seem to get into your head is that virtually all of us played since the release of Shadowbane, on a release server just like you *supposedly* did (many played even before that, in beta), so that fact alone does not qualify you as notable in any way or even "old school." You can't say you're an "old school Shadowbane player" due to what that statement implies and due to the fact that you barely even qualify as a generic "Shadowbane player," minus all other descriptive adjectives, since you were merely a casual. I'm genuinely intrigued as to how you developed this psychotic delusion that you were some good SB player during a competitive time merely because you served as a featureless scrub attached to the masses of a release server zerg that registered a modicum of success on an uncompetitive release server at a highly uncompetitive time. The level of innovation associated with GvG and siege warfare strategies had hardly come along by the time the release servers closed even. Both Vengeance and Corruption quickly became far more competitive than any individual release server on its own, as all of the most competitive guilds that had conquered and survived their respective release servers migrated to those two servers to war with one another in what could almost be analogized to a "play-offs" of sorts. Vengeance was the most populated server as a result, and a different level of siege commander had to arise since this was the only server where different alliances of 150+ clashed with one another at banes. It quickly led to the dawn of spec groups and new levels of organization. Also, Vengeance probably validated the fact that Scorn wasn't the most competitive 'release' server at all, since on Vengeance each of the foremost Scorn migrant guilds aligned from the start (several of whom were old R30's, subs or descendants) and were soon thoroughly crushed by an ad hoc alliance of Treachery guilds (who incidentally hated each other). That's just a little extra history of the game you know nothing about--maybe you can re-roll as a new username again and use it for a better impersonation of a leet "old school Shadowbane player" act. Because up until now no one has bought it, and everyone knows that you actually sucked at the game. I truly cannot comprehend why, if you were in fact supposedly so leet in other "competitive PvP games" like WoW (lol), you would repeatedly insist that we judge you according to your alleged "old school Shadowbane player" history. If we were to do so with candor, we would have to assume that in CF you're going to be low tier fodder in pursuit of cover provided by whomever is the "zerg of the moment," and that thereafter you're probably going to quit after a few weeks. Just give it up already, son.
  7. Hey dolmar! GlAd To SeE yOu HeRe.
  8. Dodge, dodge, dodge. The narcissistic basket case VIKINGNAIL has unraveled for all to see.
  9. Can you not read anything I said about my reputation in Shadowbane? Not to mention I was red on Ultima Online and had a reputation on the Asheron's Call "Darktide" infamous PK server. The fact that you think WoW was a competitive PvP game is hilarious but, like everything else you've written, quite telling. You're projecting with the "relatively unproven" charge. So what's the name of the guild that you were in, that was also the "best guild" in the R30's nation?
  10. For some reason you insist on dodging the question, and now want to exit the conversation. Curious, no?
  11. You still haven't given us the name of this alleged guild, nor have you provided one of the "many articles" discussing the PvP exploits of your guild in particular. Surely if your guild was the "best guild" in the r30's nation, then some Shadowbane veterans would remember it. So, what were they called - and any evidence that they or even you existed would be appreciated as well. And anything to do with the Emulator community is just the tip of the iceberg for me. My reputation from my release server let alone the subsequent servers I played on up until 2007 is more than sufficient to attest to my reputation.
  12. It's predictable that you would claim affinity with R30s as they were in fact one Shadowbane nation mentioned in "articles" but this was only for hacking the Scorn server, and not for any competitive endeavor. Moreover, R30s was a substantial nation composed of several guilds, several of whom continued to play Shadowbane. So which guild were you in and where are all of the "many articles" talking about your guild? There were hundreds of Shadowbane players tagged to the R30's nation in its heyday, most of whom were just fodder, so it would be laughable if you expect us to accept you as some "amazing Shadowbane player" based upon this tenuous affinity alone (which likely cannot be proven in your case anyway). As for me, everyone who is anyone in the Shadowbane community knows of me and my numerous 'competitive' exploits whether we're talking PvP or just the political game, going back to 2003 on the Treachery and even the Vengeance servers. Actually, I'm familiar with just about every Shadowbane veteran player who has posted in this thread and just about all of them either know me directly from the past or at least recognize my name and know of my reputation. You spoke of allegedly winning some "10v10s" in 2003 which of course won't be substantiated (and hardly matters, as in 2003 SB PvP wasn't particularly competitive as many guilds did not even use TeamSpeak of Ventrilo), so feel free to pull up my profile from the Shadowbane Emulator forums at shadowbaneemulator.com and note my user title. Indeed, it says "10v10 Champion" for a reason, namely that my group won a competitive tournament that was even livestreamed, with most of the fight videos still available on YouTube. Additionally, I participated in every fight and didn't die a single death in the entire tournament. The difference between a 10v10 tournament involving the SBEMU community at its peak (which inherited the ubi community) and any 10v10 fights that would have taken place on a release server in 2003 is that in the former every guild involved used voice comm servers with fully decked out and finished spec groups with spec characters while in the latter there would be about a 75%+ chance that there would be players or even an entire group of players not using voice comm, that neither group involved would be spec groups, and that the groups involved would certainly include unfinished characters with lackluster gear. In short, you're a complete nobody scrub, who still does not have a clue as to what he's talking about, who allegedly was a 'competitive PvP'er' in an alleged guild that hasn't been identified during a time when the game didn't even have truly competitive PvP as the overwhelming majority of the players were still complete nubs. Indeed, guilds like r30's and CoS and others who dominated release servers for a brief span of time did so because they were all beta guilds who learned the ropes of the game during the beta process and then they all spread out to different release servers respectively expressly because they didn't want to encounter any real PvP competition, but instead wanted to all be on separate servers where they would be the only organized beta guild contending against herds of inexperienced newbies to the game. Almost all of these guilds, R30's included, left the game at the precise point when their adversaries did finally start to learn siege craft, how to build toons, how to organize in a voice comm server, et cetera. The reason why your argument is entirely so hilarious to every Shadowbane veteran who has read it is because every single one of the premises supporting it is not just completely false but completely contradicted by the truth in every particular, as in the direct opposite of your representations is the truth. Notwithstanding all of that, you still haven't even identified your specific guild that you allege was so legendary in Shadowbane, nor have you shown us any of these alleged articles (that obviously do not exist). If you intend to reply "but I said r30's," many guilds were a part of R30's as well as many random nobody scrub players who weren't particularly good themselves but wanted to tag along with a winning nation. By the time of the migrations to Vengeance I'm pretty sure about 8 or 9/10ths of the former Scorn players could have claimed membership with R30's at one point. Thus far, you haven't substantiated any of your main claims and all you've demonstrated is your complete ignorance of the competitive PvP progression of the Shadowbane game and its player community. Moreover, not a single Shadowbane veteran player posting here knows you or remembers you; this is likely because you were in fact a nobody scrub who was never any good at the game.
  13. Most younger post-WoW MMO players haven't played a real MMORPG with real PvP, guild warfare, and player/political/server consequences. The likes of pre-Trammel UO (or "Siege Perilous" UO), Asheron's Call's brutal "Darktide" server, or Shadowbane haven't been seen for time, except for I guess "Eve Online" which is an entirely different type of game. Even though I didn't consider DAoC a 'carebear game' due to its RvR, that RvR system was still a part of the regressive descent into decadent carebear linear "faction"-based meaningless PvP. If there were any real "Millennial" students of Gibbon, Nietzsche, and Spengler who witnessed the entire progression of the major MMORPGs, they could write their "Rise, Decline, and Fall of the PvP MMO." The process follows the same trajectory of the on-going and gradual attempted re-engineering of competitive sports, erosion of martial spirit, demasculinization, and decline of Tradition in general, as in it was dictated by market trends (capital) and the supposed "feelings" of the noncompetitive masses who cannot handle the natural aristocracy of the sword fostered by real PvP in a Machiavellian-Hobbesian virtual world. The nerds who need a comfortable, apolitical linear world of two factions with cute characters, safezones, and the safe simulation of "real PvP" in optional and predictable "battlegrounds" and "arenas" are like the AIDS Skrillexes of on-line gaming, screeching "white male!!" to fully disregard + exclude the "PK!!" and "griefer!!" oppressors who slammed the weak into lockers and took their lunch money. Catering to the rather anti-freedom preferences of this demographic could of course be justified for over a decade because of WoW's success in the marketplace. In a sense, then, Crowfall aims to be reactionary, hoping to return us to a freer and more natural past that was sacrificed for the glut of simulacra produced for the appetites of the dull, weak, and feminized masses. And if Crowfall isn't this, shelving the "massively merciless, play to crush" intention to make a few brony snowflakes happy, the game will suck.
  14. ROFL! Really? Unless you're claiming to be some nobody scrub who tagged to one of the guilds from Scorn who were talked about in articles for a brief period regarding the havoc they wreaked during server hacking I have to call BS on the "I know there are many articles that talk about my guild in shadowbane from all the way back in 2003." I mean, c'mon kid, do you even understand the words that you are using here? I'm not one to throw around the "narcissist" label lightly as it's typically used by people who don't actually understand the technical definition, but the person who said that may have hit the nail on the head. Not only are you clearly self-obsessed with your purported on-line game glory, but you apparently lack the capacity to genuinely reflect on the substance of your boastful claims and are completely immune to the tinge of guilt or embarrassment that normal people feel when caught in an outright lie or when a glorifying fabrication is just completely wrong in its details with no connection to reality. Let's break it down for you so you truly understand what I mean here. You said that you "know" there are "many articles" that talk about "your guild" in Shadowbane from all the way back in 2003. Now, a normal person with just a scintilla of caution (and general self-awareness) would tend to avoid using such extreme verbiage because it can be so easily refuted or contradicted, at least in technical terms. More specifically, a normal veteran from Shadowbane would tend to stray from such verbiage simply because I honestly don't think there were any individual SB guilds that were ever talked about in many "articles" (meaning what normal people mean by "article" as opposed to a loose, 'democratic,' and all-inclusive definition of the term...) But you said it, not I. Let's see the many articles!
×
×
  • Create New...