Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

GrimAndProper

Testers
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About GrimAndProper

  • Rank
    Hatchling

Profile Information

  • Language
    English
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Brisbane, Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

388 profile views
  1. Thanks for the reply Hyriol. I am glad that having recipes unlock via skills is still the main pathway. You are probably correct in that it is currently on the development backburner as it currently works fine for testing purposes. I also like this idea, although it would be a little bit more work for ACE as they would have to balance it to make sure the mature skilled crafter is better off (or maybe it isn't more work because I think they still are better off anyway? I'm not an expert on all of the crafting formulas).
  2. This has been the case for some time now. I would love to know if the plan is to return the recipes to the skill tree or to keep them as discipline only. As it currently stands it feels clunky and odd.
  3. Definitely a fan of this. I particularly want to see a horse archer, however, balance would be key in making sure it isn't overpowered... I doubt that this will happen though as they are basing them off of the Romans which is strange as they weren't known for their cavalry or using unique cavalry tactics... The Eastern Roman Empire used kataphraktoi which would be pretty equivalent to your number 1 and is pretty much in theme (even though they spoke Greek they still called themselves Roman).
  4. Although the idea of getting in early makes me nearly quiver in delight, I am with those calling for the soft launch idea to be reconsidered. There are very few titles that have ever had a successful soft launch. The only one I can think of was DOTA 2 and this was largely due to the huge community that DOTA had before DOTA 2 development. When it comes to MMOs I doubt it has ever worked to the advantage of the game. I believe the main reason MMOs fail to get off the ground is twofold; Firstly, obtaining a large enough active community to support an MMO environment (one that doesn't feel like a ghost town) requires extensive advertising and marketing. A "hard launch", both physical and digital is a great avenue for pre-launch advertising especially in the case of digital format when a popular platform like Steam is used. The wait and anticipation for launch events are very handy at creating hype. The dream game you have described in the past as Crowfall is particularly prone to this. Because you want to market to so many individual communities and have dedicated servers in smaller countries (like Australia) you will need to attract a relatively large player base from each region so if advertising isn't effective some regions will begin as the classic "ghost town" of a dying MMO. The second problem is always having the content to keep people active. Some MMOs fail because they look healthier then they are. At launch subscription and activity tends to be high, however, if there is not enough content activity can drop rapidly but still appear fine in the number of members. This tends to lead into a vicious cycle of dropping activity and subsequent subscription cancellations until the game dies. Both of these facts discredit the idea for an MMO soft launch. Another problem that players don't like entering a new game they just paid for at a disadvantage that cannot be overcome by playing more or better than other players. If you allow the backers to enter earlier and do not reset the servers then they will have a time advantage over everyone else. This is compounded by the way you level in the game. By the time you open it up to more players the early backers will be months ahead in training and new players can never really catch up. I honestly believe a soft launch will be the end of the game.
×
×
  • Create New...