Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Shiner

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

51 profile views
  1. At the time of writing, I note the OP has a total of 34 captures. Doesn't seem like a person qualified to call such a silly petition, nor to judge this aspect of the game. 1. May I ask, how many of these points were from capturing camps and towers? 2. How many were from Forts? 3. How many were from Solo actions? Myself, on the other hand having nearly 500 captures thinks the motivation for this is clouded manipulation...yet again.
  2. - 1,000,000 Another self-serving "contribution" (the OP), conveniently timed when the swing is against the "control trend". IMO, the original post does not contemplate a game improvement, merely an admission that now they have to do what everyone else has to do, instead of pack-roaming and wanting not to have to WORK for a win. What's really the problem? You run in packs of 2 groups (minimum) most of the time...how long does it take to flip a camp with 12 people? - LOL Lots of up voters...wonder which guild they are in mostly (already a biased petition with results nothing more than utterly useless) ..., must have lifted the "forum code of silence" from within. This is more like...We aren't really winning this capping war...lets start a petition to change the rules to ones which suit us. We can see right through this and I hope ACE does to. There is movement at the station! PS. Has anyone published the siege videos of the last couple of days? Must have missed seeing them
  3. A great topic for discussion, and well worth the effort required. The other concern I have with this, is the caveat required for reinstatement...of a "control measure". This assumes the person is guilty, and making them admit guilt, even when they may not be guilty and may in fact be the wronged person. IMHO, this caveat needs to be removed forthwith. So unless you do this....we won't do that... I think there are words for this...yes? I'll plead guilty to avoid the hangmans noose...and take life in prison....because the risk is too great...even though I know I am innocent...It happens! Play the ball, not the man I say. Where is the accountability of the controller, once outted for bias and hate of their own? - How can a complaint be made, without being intercepted by the said controller? Where is the "public apology" when a person was banned unjustly? - It is asked that players admit their fault, even if possibly not their fault (the caveat)...where is the offset to that?
  4. Sincere Question, How can any member have confidence that the "rules" are applied fairly and across the board? Without bias nor favouritism? I'd hate to think the decision to enforce a ban (for anyone of any faction) was left up to the sole discretion of a single person...god help any poster if that person is having a bad day, or already has a dislike for any particular person. You use a restaurant client as an example above: Why was a pint of beer thrown? - Why was there verbal insults? - Perhaps self-defence. You walked in the door from the kitchen, and saw what you saw...you didn't see what happened prior to walking into the room yourself. This would then lead to welcoming back the "abusive client", apologizing to him/her...and probably throwing in a free dinner! There is always a danger when you only consider part-facts and only view and interpret what you want. (generalised) I have had this situation happen in RL during my private security days. A body guard was taken to court for assault/use of excessive force on the back of a photo and related parties to the complainant statements. The photo was dramatic, and did look bad...but it ONLY showed a snap-shot...literally a millisecond in time. When this got to court, we presented the video surveillance of 5 minutes before and 5 minutes after the event, full scope of area (the lead up, the accused incident, and the actions taken by the Body Guard (s))... As I am sure your already guessing, the facts presented to the court, were not "real", were dishonest and misleading (lies). Our company received an apology from the court, the complainant was severely reprimanded by the Judge (lucky wasn't charged, but we did not push it, the discrediting was enough for us), and the Police were also told to be more thorough and use some common sense in their investigation and judgement. Also, (generalised)...any shop can have a "no returns policy after purchase"....fine, they can put anything they like into any policy they want. But.. If it is not substantiated in law, its worthless. If the law say returns must be given, then that negates the Policy statement. People just need to be aware of the Law.
  5. Your really not that good at this are you. I can see by the date stamps on the quotes you quoted, that at least one was posted after your blatant lies that you fought 63 at the fight. You don't even need to look back to check, because the quote actually refers to it :). I can't be bothered in checking the others, as you lie about 1, your capable of lying about anything and on top of that you fail to also reference whether each of these quotes is represented in the context you imply or was a response to you or your guilds arrogance. Its like presenting a photo in court of a situation on a particular day to show something...only to find out the photo was taken the day before/after, and the person presenting the 'lying' photo has something to hide or something to gain from altering the facts. You have perjured yourself to the community. (You said you'd be honest and transparent!) @Jah Shame on you Jah. Now please answer my questions listed in my previous posts asking for answers! - You know them, so don't ask
  6. I am very sure Mr Coleman can see right through your smoke and mirrors....just need a little wind and all is clear to see. Excuse me /leans over to fart...ahh, clear already, didn't need as much wind as I thought.
  7. @Jah Still waiting...for a reply to this please. Oh my.../sigh More misleading dribble. 1. Out number = Possibly Yes. 2. Outnumber at the fight. Actually at the fight as you seem to continually wish to mislead people to thinking = 100% NO. Question for you: Lets put some perspective into your misleading comments, which you are purely clutching as the basis for your argument and only have that to hold onto which is numbers, pure numbers, and which also remains unsubstantiated even after repeated requests for it: How many LVL 1-10 players, inexperienced, in Intermediate Gear and Welfare Weapons (vendor), no jewelery, and no idea of a good discipline set-up.. would it take to take down a fully Geared (Blue/Purple or Gold), experienced, correctly specked, correctly disciplined, coloured jewelry wearing opposition faction combatant, just one of them. This really makes a joke out of your continued "NUMBERS" argument - consider only the FACTS, that you want to consider, and use those as your only defense. Sir, You have been found wanting! - Time for your Leaders to face the community and stop hiding. Let them post something with some maturity and less bombastic arrogance. Note to self: Must stop calling this misleading, must call it what it as now...lying!
  8. "I know I could probably step in and ask the main guilds right now to stop holding hands" ROFLMAO Just what we think too....Ride in the coat tails, holding hands and frolicking in the meadows of Crowfall. Enjoy your Gold Shiny ...It will be a Badge of Dishonour. I note @Jah You've reduced your numbers in the commentary to 60 now, but didn't edit the video title to reflect your misleading. And I further note, we are waiting for your to confirm that there were 63 ooppps 60 now, ACTUALLY AT THE FIGHT. I cant believe you tagged jtodd with your lies (lying via deception) and claim everyone else is misleading ACE. This just shows total disrespect to him. Steal $1 or steal $100, not a lot in it some would say....others would say, if you have the precedence to steal $1, then you'd steal $100. Dishonesty is dishonesty...the value matters little, its in your DNA.
  9. Congrats on the video @Ble Winterblades Propaganda & Arrogance Committee can take a few lessons from you perhaps? Appreciated the (lack) of editing. (Shows a clear unambiguous fight) Appreciated a simple, NO-BS title, Appreciated a respectful commentary in your post accompanying it. Spot on, well done!
  10. Needs a more equitable distribution of graves, graves levels and races please. (including higher level) Hurting many players loyal to their race and class
  11. Change the stats Gold gets = MINUS 2500 health..... Silver gets +5000 health No more problems
  12. "ACE Development Partners" Perhaps this needs reviewing...hahaha
  13. Ok I am done with your low level contributions to the discussions. Passive aggressive is a sad stand to take.
  14. NO...definitely not...But a few people within HOA were an asset that's 100%. If you want to know who the work-horses were...look to the ones on during the quiet hours (many guilds)...Standing 20 people on a camp with two lvl 2 guards to get 20 points on the score board does not make a work-horse. Please don't belittle other guilds (of any faction) that their contribution is not valued and = where only numbers are a differential. I did not think HOA was grandstanding and waving their own flag, but your sure trying to make it look like they felt self-important. I sure hope your not HOA
  • Create New...