Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

FenrisDDevil

Testers
  • Content Count

    2,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by FenrisDDevil

  1. 10m$? Weren't you at 7 and something, including the 2.5m$ you had in crowdfunding? Math doesn't add
  2. volevo dirvi che ho provato ieri sera il Big World ed ho fatto una mini-anteprima per mmo.it ... se avete domande chiedete pure
  3. Have you ever played town of salem?
  4. What have they done to make you mad? Just curious.
  5. Vi ricordo comunque che di tanto in tanto posto news su mmo.it, per lo più riassunti di quelle ufficiali ma (penso) più dettagliate di quant'altro si trovi in italiano sul web!
  6. Streaming when the EUs are sleeping doesn't help. EDIT: Just saying... I know you guys did it off work so it had to be late. I approve the initiative though!
  7. We get it that you sucked on Darkfall, no need to say it everytime. The impression was never that Crowfall would have had pure FF active on all the rulesets. If you cared to read what I linked (the super old thread), it was clear to everyone even then that the best case scenario was pure FF in the dregs and decreasing FF penalties in easier rulesets. You don't like friendly fire, it's alright. It doesn't mean that you have to pretend that the DEVs have been honest and clear on the matter. If they end up not using FF anywhere, they will have broken a promise they made before and after the KS, period. Not to mention they would have been dishonest times and times again when we complained about combat not being built for FF and they told us to chill and wait. Love the comment from the guy with the eggs. Well done missing the whole custard1ng point.
  8. You clearly haven't read what Caenth said in his first post here. Anyhow, be back later.
  9. Really? The quote clearly implies that friendly fire would be there in the majority of the worlds, or at least in some (if things didn't turn out as they expected). ACE has never really stated things more clearly than that, so if they really remove friendly fire we can expect them to remove basically anything else they want. Which isn't bad per se, but if we want to define what they promised and what they did not, friendly fire clearly fits in the first subset.
  10. Google. It's fundamental. Physics FAQ, answer 4 or something. Then read out the threads about friendly fire and the devs responses to them. Thank their horrid devtrack that goes back 3-6 months or so, otherwise there would be plenty more.
  11. Are you blind? 15. DOES THAT MEAN THAT I CAN BE HIT BY FRIENDLY FIRE? Wherever possible, yes -- but we have to make sure that this is balanced. Some rules sets (like the infected worlds, which are Faction based) divide players automatically into teams. We have to make sure that players can't join teams specifically to take advantage of friendly fire to grief their own "teammates." Our plan is to try and apply debuffs to players for doing damage to or killing their teammates (the gods curse you for your incompetence). If this proves not to be a good enough deterrent, however, we may have to turn friendly fire off for particular Campaign worlds. It's hard to pull back quotes from a year and a half ago, thank god I made a thread about it back then and saved a few.
  12. So you skipped the part about the FAQ and Tully answering on the forum entirely. Great job carebeard. Right. The Dayz / H1Z1 mode in a MMORPG where who hides the most, who has more friends or who's the luckiest wins. Great job to you too sir.
  13. It's not your fault. Thanks for sharing that piece of information actually, but you can't expect us not to react to it. ACE shouldn't fear confrontation on the forum. I feel like I am the only one with a bit of memory here, and since my memory usually sucks you guys must be bots or something. ACE has promised FF numerous times. If you're looking for a "WE'LL DEFINITELY HAVE FRIENDLY FIRE" quote you won't find one, 'cause ACE and its developers have been ultra-cautious about any feature (duelist digging, full loot in the dregs, the whole "the shadow" ruleset ordeal... and the list goes on), they're the masters of promising things and not promising things at the same time. Todd's school. Anyhow it's always been obvious to us who have followed the game since the start. At first it was the promise of not having "groups" in The Dregs, not in terms of guilds but rather "targeting groups" so that anyone could attack / backstab anyone at anytime without the hassle of going through "friendly fire toggling" bullcrap. Then it was the promise of going full in with physics, which clearly implied the fact that projectile had to be stopped by bodies (of all kinds, friends included) and of course damaging them otherwise physics goes to the toilet. But now the only thing based on physics are those horrendous pushes that make team fights super chaotic (not even a form of bullet drop included). Even then, things were kinda uncertain... so we asked them. They included the answer in a FAQ which might or might not be there anymore. I made a thread about it. The FAQ clearly stated that FF would be enabled "wherever possible", which again can be interpreted in many ways but was clearly a sign that the Dregs would at least have it. I made Tully so mad that he had to answer, and oh boy he did it hard: "I'm not entirely sure how you can read an FAQ that mentions the possibility of turning off friendly fire on 1 or 2 of the announced rulesets, and to you that translates to "only FFA has friendly fire". Make no mistake, we'll be working and testing this area heavily and we'll find what works best for each campaign ruleset. We might find a way to execute it well on all of them, we may not. It's best not to jump to hyperbolic conclusion's when we're being very forward and open with our thinking with you on this." Tully... look at us now. A song from Serj Tankian comes to mind. Not so sure about that. Now, maybe, that the forum has been basically taken over by the usual casual MMO crowd that buys the game and then leaves it after a month. But it used to be different. I challenge you to try making the poll again, see how things have changed. Definitely not a vocal minority though. You're the vocal minority. No poorly made socks sherlock. ACE can do whatever it wants with the game and still manage to make a profit out of it. We were here to see certain features get done and be implemented though. And without us I am not so sure how well the KS would have ended. Maybe you're new and you don't understand... imagine if your sissy Roleplay got banned somehow from the game. ----------------------------------- That being said. Again, ACE can change their design whenever they want and it wouldn't be the first time. What hurts the most is that WE have seen the combat being built up, WE told them it wouldn't work with FF and if they wanted to stick with that design they had to change it, THEY repeatedly asked us to calm down 'cause they knew what they were doing and it was prealpha after all. Turns out they didn't know what they were doing and ended up choking on their own food.
  14. This is depressing, considering that we warned them, we told them.. And they kept answering: "dont worry it's prealpha"...
  15. the dregs is supposed to have friendly fire ............ .........
  16. It's nowhere near 50/50.. Everyone hates frontloading combos.. And DMG splitting.
×
×
  • Create New...