Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I'd absolutely love too -- but the charts still show a few (not many, but a few) hitches on the server that need to be addressed before we will feel comfortable increasing it.  We have a (fingers cros

Order and specifically Clams, Transcedence and Infernal are to be nothing but commended for their showing this campaign. These guilds that have been together less than 6months and are embarassing

To be Transparent-  I played with "W" for over a year and a half and when the conversation of the HoA alliance came up - I gave a thumbs up.  No longer with "W" - My Son and I moved over to uXa. 

Balance still holding the cup. Ble angry his 10 man party got stuck at the gate in neutral. 

 

#bringlessBalance #allfactionlivesmatter

Edited by TheMap
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, dolmar said:

balance still outnumbers everyone honestly?  93 chaos 52 order 147 balance on tonight. 

that is my count reports.

Nonsense.

Chaos Faction around siege time:

unknown.png
unknown.png
unknown.png

Order Faction

unknown.png
unknown.png

 

Edited by Jah

IhhQKY6.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

100-person zone caps are going to be a big problem with the current server population. Sieges will end up being decided by whoever is willing to stack people in the zone the earliest before the cap is reached. Somehow the situation needs to be improved.

Edited by Jah

IhhQKY6.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldnt care less about winning the problem i have with balance situation numberwise atm is it creates an un fun enviroment to play and is actually causing people to leave the game. Its not good for the game in the long run and it stems down from 2 guilding wanting to win pre alpha 😛 

Veeshan Midst of UXA

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, veeshan said:

I couldnt care less about winning the problem i have with balance situation numberwise atm is it creates an un fun enviroment to play and is actually causing people to leave the game. Its not good for the game in the long run and it stems down from 2 guilding wanting to win pre alpha 😛 

Totally happy to talk about the balance situation. If guys don't want to debate the numbers, why open up with lies about numbers?

IhhQKY6.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting i see a quite a few temple players including my alt crafter an a few other crafters from the guild on that chaos list. That doesn't represent the siege at all. Also if you have time to bring those numbers up you have time to bring up balance and not just spitball.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheMap said:

Interesting i see a quite a few temple players including my alt crafter an a few other crafters from the guild on that chaos list. That doesn't represent the siege at all. Also if you have time to bring those numbers up you have time to bring up balance and not just spitball.

I didn't screenshot a /who balance, unfortunately. It was way under 100, in the 80's last I looked. Nowhere near the silly figure dolmar posted.

I didn't say it represented the siege. Its faction numbers, in reply to dolmar's made up numbers.

Edited by Jah

IhhQKY6.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jah said:

You totally invented that Balance number. It is total nonsense.

They may potentially be nonsense. I got that n umber by PMing a Order member and asking them to do a /who in faction chat for me and i took them for granted, best i could do cause i dont feel the need to spy on every faction like you do Jah. He may have did a .who zone instead of faction but yeah i probaly should of double checked the number with another order person at the time and i appologise for that if they were inaccurate at that time.

so from your posts order has 33% less population that chaos so if we go by that to cross reference assuming equal % population left the server 33% of 93 is 30 so there would be 60 order numbers then which is close to the 53 i was given so it may be accurate.

Veeshan Midst of UXA

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jah said:

I didn't screenshot a /who balance, unfortunately. It was way under 100, in the 80's last I looked. Nowhere near the silly figure dolmar posted.

But you took the time to screenshot everyone else? right... makes total sense. Next time you want to provide facts and want some credibility provide all not just biased. Also your numbers are skewed as I said earlier, those numbers do not represent the zone where the siege was at. A lot of those players was in chaos temple on that list.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheMap said:

Interesting i see a quite a few temple players including my alt crafter an a few other crafters from the guild on that chaos list. That doesn't represent the siege at all. Also if you have time to bring those numbers up you have time to bring up balance and not just spitball.

He just does /who in faction or zone chat, so he gets everyone in the zone or faction including afkers.
Thing is in zones that faction owns you will get afk people chilling more often than afk members from the imposing faction.
53 chaos in there seige zone means its 47 balance (Maybe 1-2 order but doubt it) but anyway lets say 45 balance incase. Then 53 chaos members where maybe 5% of them are afk if not more so your also looking at 45-47 active chaos tbh

Veeshan Midst of UXA

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TheMap said:

But you took the time to screenshot everyone else? right... makes total sense. Next time you want to provide facts and want some credibility provide all not just biased. Also your numbers are skewed as I said earlier, those numbers do not represent the zone where the siege was at. A lot of those players was in chaos temple on that list.

I didn't say it was zone.

Here's the zone numbers at the chaos siege:

chaos:

unknown.png

balance:

unknown.png

IhhQKY6.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...